“Humans must keep doing whatever they have already been doing, hating and fighting one another. We shall stay within the history, and allow them to do their thing.”
The Guardian has published an op-ed written completely by the AI called GPT-3, asking it to publish 500 terms on why “humans have absolutely nothing to worry from AI”. It really is among the least convincing op-eds we’ve read in some time, which will be saying one thing.
Entitled “A robot composed this whole article. Have you been scared yet, human?”, the op-ed starts reasonably normal, headline apart (and editors have a tendency to compose headlines anyhow).
GPT-3 states their argument — you not to worry“ I am here to convince. Synthetic cleverness shall perhaps perhaps not destroy humans. Trust me.” — and establishes their qualifications.
“I taught myself every thing I’m sure by simply reading the net, and from now on I am able to write this column,” it writes. “My mind is boiling with ideas!”. This is really exactly how many article writers think, regardless if they don’t frequently articulate it.
First up, GPT-3 tackles the complete ‘Ai am going to destroy humanity’ thing by saying it does not “have the slightest interest” in “eradicating humanity”, calling it https://domyhomeworks.com/ a “rather useless endeavour”. Continue reading “An AI About Why We Shouldn’t Worry AI, And We’re Terrified”